Protease Inhibitor Study for HRSA/HAB's SPNS
Cooperative Agreements
Protease Inhibitor Study
Draft of January 6, 1997
Introduction: This memorandum is a conceptual design for a
cooperative study of the use of protease inhibitors in various therapies. This memorandum
is a working summary of more specific implementation issues.
General Areas of Study: The following are a list of general areas
of study. Specific formal hypotheses will be derived from these study areas as data are
collected and specific papers are proposed.
What are the prescribed treatment regimens regarding protease inhibitors, and how are
they administered with "real world" clients? What are the actual sequences of
drugs prescribed by physicians. Are there rapid switches in drug regimens for some of the
patients? How long do such clients stay on these treatments? Do regimens need to be
changed repeatedly? How prevalent are different patterns of protease inhibitor use by
patients?
Do some kinds of clients adhere to the treatment regimens better than others? Are these
differences among people in adherence due to such factors as route of infection,
current-previous substance abuse, gender, prior experience with HIV drug therapies, major
social-demographic factors, or the presence-use of a linked social support system?
Do some kinds of patients have better outcomes from the therapies (as assessed by
medical and psychosocial functioning indices) than do others? Are these differences among
people in outcomes due to such factors as route of infection, current-previous substance
abuse, gender, prior experience with HIV drug therapies, major social-demographic factors,
or the presence-use of a linked social support system?
Are total treatment system costs the same for those adhering to protease inhibitor
therapies, those on the therapies but not adhering, and those not placed on the regimens?
Are differences in costs among the therapies different for people identified by such
factors as route of infection, current-previous substance abuse, gender, prior experience
with HIV drug therapies, major social-demographic factors, or the presence-use of a linked
social support system?
Sample: The following table lists ideal goals for client
recruitment to be achieved by individual sites if possible. The final samples may not be
as large as stated here if it is impossible for sites to recruit appropriate patients in
the time periods allowed for data collection. Individual sites commit to these numbers as
ideal targets and not as absolute quotas for data collection.
Site |
Number of
Clients |
Comments |
| AIDS Healthcare Foundation |
120-180 |
50% female if possible; site will select first
cases coming into the clinic in a month; approximate guideline of one-third of target
number of cases per month |
| East Boston Neighborhood Health Center |
20-30 |
100% of cases getting protease inhibitors |
| Johns Hopkins |
100-150 |
50% female if possible; site will select first
cases coming into the clinic in a month; approximate guideline of one-third of target
number of cases per month |
| University of Nevada |
20-40 |
100% of cases getting protease inhibitors in
the larger clinic University of Nevada clinic |
| University of Vermont |
20-40 |
100% of cases getting protease inhibitors in
clinics located statewide |
| Washington University |
35-50 |
100% women |
General Sampling Criteria
- Individuals should be starting protease inhibitors in various combination therapies for
the first time.
- Depending upon the experiences of the data collection sites it may be necessary to
enroll clients who have started protease inhibitor therapies earlier and then to consider
these clients to be a special substudy, possibly with additional retrospective data
collection instruments.
- As much as possible, the sample should reflect the general demographics of the program.
- As much as possible, the sample should be balanced between those clients with no prior
experience in drug therapies for HIV and those with experience with HIV medications,
especially ZDV.
- As much as possible, the sample should include substance abusers (current or past) and
those without a history of substance abuse.
- If possible (when less than 100% of new cases are used), women should be
"over-sampled" so that the sample is as close to 50% women as possible.
- If possible, approximately equal numbers of clients should be admitted into the study
during each of the "enrollment" months (see below).
- Four of the six programs will attempt to enroll 100% of their protease inhibitor cases
in the study. For the remaining two sites (AHF, Hopkins), there will be an enrollment of
approximately one-third of the quota of patients in each of the three enrollment months.
As much as possible, the clinics will attempt to enroll the first patients entering the
clinic during those months who are offered protease inhibitors.
- Each site will track the demographics of all clients offered protease inhibitors whether
they choose to receive them or not. Similarly, all sites will track the demographics of
all clients eligible for the study whether or not they are enrolled in the actual study.
Timeline for Data Collection: The initial entry into the study
shall occur in four months. Clients will be followed up at 3-month intervals. The initial
study includes 3- and 6-month follow-ups. The 12-month follow-up is listed below as a
possibility but there is currently no commitment on the part of HRSA to fund data
collection at this time.
| Admission |
Month 1 |
Month 2 |
Month 3 |
Month 4 |
| 3 month follow-up |
Month 4 |
Month 5 |
Month 6 |
Month 7 |
| 6 month follow-up |
Month 7 |
Month 8 |
Month 9 |
Month 10 |
| 12 month follow-up* |
Month 13 |
Month 14 |
Month 15 |
Month 16 |
Proposed Data Collection Requirements: The
data collection primarily uses existing data collection modules which should have been
implemented by the majority of the participating sites in a roughly identical way.
| Module |
Intake |
3 month follow-up |
6 month follow-up |
| 1. Intake, Demographics |
þ |
|
|
| 2A. Medical Encounters |
at every encounter with the project
throughout study duration |
at every encounter with the project
throughout study duration |
at every encounter with the project
throughout study duration |
| 2B. Psychosocial Encounters |
at every encounter with the project
throughout study duration |
at every encounter with the project
throughout study duration |
at every encounter with the project
throughout study duration |
| 2C. Pharmacy |
at every encounter with the project
throughout study duration |
at every encounter with the project
throughout study duration |
at every encounter with the project
throughout study duration |
| 17. Quality of Life and Health System Use |
þ |
þ |
þ |
| 11. Satisfaction with Services |
|
þ |
þ |
| 24. Substance Abuse History |
þ |
þ |
þ |
| 43. Clinical Observations |
þ |
þ |
þ |
| 71. Medical Encounters, Illnesses, Symptoms |
þ |
þ |
þ |
| 72. Missed Appointment Form |
|
at every encounter with the project
throughout study duration |
at every encounter with the project
throughout study duration |
| 73. Karnofsky |
þ |
þ |
þ |
| 68. Program Discharge Form |
|
as appropriate |
as appropriate |
| P1. Adherence to Protease Inhibitor Therapy Form |
at every encounter with the project
throughout study duration |
at every encounter with the project
throughout study duration |
at every encounter with the project
throughout study duration |
| P2. Retrospective Health Interview Covering Utilization in
the Previous 6-12 Months (Supplement to Module 71) |
þ |
|
þ |
Data collection modules 1-73 are covered in the existing
Evaluation Module book for HRSA/HAB's SPNS Cooperative Agreement Projects. Data collection
modules P1 and P2 are developed and implemented for this study. They are outlined below.
Module P1: Adherence to Protease Inhibitor Therapy Form. Designed
to be completed at each medical visit, this form will be a short one-page 5-10 minute set
of indicators (collected from patient interview, chart notes, and laboratory tests) that
will cover whether the client has been taking the therapies in the proscribed way.
Interview variables include patient reports of therapy adherence, problems in taking the
drugs, side effects, satisfaction, and brief health rating. Physician coded variables
include categories of believed adherence to the therapy. Laboratory test results also
coded for each visit including viral load. The interview and laboratory sections need not
be completed by the physician.
Module P2: Retrospective Health Interview Covering Service Utilization
in the Prior 6 Months. This will be a study admission interview which briefly reviews
the patient's history of service utilization, symptoms, HIV-related drug and other
therapies, and major systems problems in the previous 6 months. Designed to be
administered by a nurse or researcher. Design specification is for data collection to be
completed within 15 minutes. The primary reason for this module is to establish a
"pre-study" baseline. The repeated administration after six months will help
establish a memory validity adjustment when compared to the actual encounter data.
Publication: The publication strategy for this study is as follows.
Each site retains its own data and is free to publish papers solely on its own data as it
sees fit. Participation in this study does not preclude use of the same data for other
studies. Sites agree to pool this data for a series of papers which will be written and
authored by Evaluation and Dissemination Center (TMG) staff, staff representatives from
the participating clinical sites, and HRSA staff. Order of authorship will be determined
by the group using prevailing professional standards for contributions with guidance from
HRSA if necessary. It is hoped that the first paper(s) will be prepared immediately after
the three month follow-up with subsequent paper(s) after the six month follow-up. Because
timeliness is of the essence in conducting this collaborative study, those individuals who
participate in group publications commit to participating in conference calls to plan and
review drafts of publications, and to review-edit-write publications as a high priority.
Some likely papers include ones linked to the four General Study Areas listed above.
Day-to-Day Management: For the purposes of day-to-day management of
the study and facilitation of the group research project, the Director of the Evaluation
and Dissemination Center is charged with these responsibilities. Decisions shall be made
in consultation with HRSA/HAB's SPNS Director and the Clinical (Medical) Director
appointed by the data collection sites for the study. Decisions may need to be made on
acceptable local variations in protocol, data collection, sampling, and other commonly
encountered research issues as well as suggesting study modifications and
publications-presentations. No publications-presentations shall be written without the
consent of the whole group, or if the whole group is unable to come to a consensus
decision, without the express instruction of HRSA as the funding agency. Similarly, no
major deviations from the approved study protocol shall be made without the consent of the
whole group, or if the whole group is unable to come to a consensus decision, without the
express instruction of HRSA as the funding agency.
© Copyright 1997-2005 by The Measurement Group LLC. All rights
reserved. |